Mood and Affect abstracts and tables:
![]()
Journal of Mental Health and Aging, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1996
Ira R. Katz, MD, PhD
Patricia Paramelee, PhD
Abstract:
Depressive disorders, both major depression and other less severe but nonetheless clinically significant depressions, are common comorbidities, components, or complications of dementia. Recent research has shown that both the diagnosis of major depression and ratings of typical depressive symptoms can be conducted reliably, even in patients with dementia. For individuals with mild to moderate cognitive impairment, self-ratings of depression with Geriatric Depression Scale appear to remain valid. Among interviewer-administered instruments, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and the Cornell Scale are the best established. Potential difficulties with assessment include problems with ascertainment (with families, in general, reporting greater depression than clinicians) and the ambiguity of symptoms (because apathy and related symptoms can result from both depression and Alzheimer’s disease). Although diagnostic methods and rating scales developed with cognitively intact patients remain useful, there is need for further research to characterize the pathology of mood and affect that occurs in patients with dementia. Approaches that show promise include multiple repeated self-reports of affect and direct observations of behavior.
Back to Top - - No associated table.
![]()
Journal of Mental Health and Aging, Vol. 7, No. 1,
2001
Cross-Cultural Assessment Of Geriatric Depression: A Review Of The CES-D And The GDS .
Denise Burnette, PhD
Li Mei Chen, MSW
Abstract:
This article reviews published studies on the utility and psychometric properties of the two most widely used screening instruments for depressive symptomatology among older populations, the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Studies on the CES-D confirms its usefulness for measuring depression in diverse groups of older adults, however, further research examining criterion validity among different cultural groups is needed. Sociocultural and health-related factors appeared to influence differential patterns of item endorsement and factor structures of the CES-D in these studies. The composition and hierarchy of factors varied: the well-being factor was consistently problematic in non-Western cultures, two rather than four factors were a better fit for data on Hispanic elders, the interpersonal problem factor was most salient for African Americans, and depressed affect and somatic factors were conflated for American Indians. Research on the psychometric properties of the GDS suggests that without alterations it may not be sufficiently valid for use in other cultures.
Back to Top - - No associated table.
American
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2002, 10 (5) pp. 506-514
Influence
Of Cognitive Impairment, Illness, Gender, And African-American Status On
Psychiatric Ratings And Staff Recognition Of Depression
Jeanne
A. Teresi, Ed.D., Ph.D.
Robert
Abrams, M.D.
Douglas
Holmes, Ph.D.
Mildred
Ramirez, Ph.D.
Carol
Shapiro, R.N.
Joseph
P. Eimicke, B.S.
Back to Top - - No associated table.
Journal of
Mental Health and Aging, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1976
Valorie Shue, BA
Cornelia Beck, PhD, RN, FAAN
M. Powell
Abstract:
Recognition of affect in frail and cognitively impaired (CI) elders may provide a means to target interventions and determine the outcomes of those interventions. Several instruments are available to measure affect in frail and CI elders. This article presents an overview of those instruments preceded by a rationale for measuring affect in frail and CI elders and an overview of the research on emotion.
Back to Top - - No associated table.